如果決定不符合勢力薄弱的一方要求，那麼，他們是該抗拒呢？還是該妥協？
準備妥協而不考慮抗拒的人，又可以有多大的談判力量？
#眼見反對安心出行卻又持續光顧有感
Sunday, February 28, 2021
Friday, February 26, 2021
改變的成本︰每人五千
港府派發五千元電子消費券，除了利益輸送，就是要以用五個月時間，改變香港人的消費習慣。
好端端的「$5000」，拖長為「$1,000 x 5個月」，像訓練小狗一樣，令未改變的人改變過來。順便搭載國產支付寶，讓你覺得支付寶限制較少、選擇較多，那「$1,000 x 5」用起來更方便。
事實上，這筆錢，是借來的小確幸，有毒的。你不要，沒有吃虧，也沒有蝕給政府。正如養鬼仔，做這種傷害現世和後世的事，是要填命的。
大膽推測，港共日後將會製造罪案，要令人覺得電子貨幣比現金安全，貫徹共產黨的長期統戰和心戰。
環看世界，愈優秀的國家，愈用現金，芬蘭和日本都不會大力推動電子貨幣；反而愈變態的國家，就愈沉迷高科技交易。
Wednesday, February 24, 2021
疫苗？不了。身體髮膚，受之父母，不敢毀傷， 孝之始也
大家紛紛比較各國疫苗，甚麼德國BioNTech有效率達95%、牛津大學的阿斯利康只有一宗嚴重副作用，中共科興則怎麼怎麼不滯。政治操作就是這樣，給你兩篤屎，你就會覺得吃一滴屎就是上乘的，而不去要求不吃屎。
疫苗？不了。身體髮膚，受之父母，不敢毀傷， 孝之始也。
 |
| https://twitter.com/HelpSoshk/status/1363096273331449859 |
 |
| https://twitter.com/au_wong/status/1364181391043305475 |
Wednesday, February 17, 2021
數學是種族主義？！Mathematics is Racism?!
//Part of the toolkit includes a list of ways "white supremacy culture" allegedly "infiltrates math classrooms." Those include "the focus is on getting the 'right' answer," students being "required to 'show their work,'" and other alleged manifestations.
"The concept of mathematics being purely objective is unequivocally false, and teaching it is even much less so," the document for the "Equitable Math" toolkit reads. "Upholding the idea that there are always right and wrong answers perpetuate objectivity as well as fear of open conflict."//
翻譯︰如果你相信數學上有絕對答案，如「2+2=4」，那麼，你就是種族主義者，因為不相信「2+2=4」的人會恐懼，怕會陷入「公開衝突」。
換言之，以後數學考試，你不能問「1+1=?」，你只可以問「1+1，你覺得會是多少？」然後，非白人學生答曰「3」，你不能說他錯，充其量只能說「a very unique, very original, very revolutionary and very critical answer」。
George Orwell的極權主義寓言《1984》中，就已展示出極權主義的最終權力，在於訓練公民絕對相信「2 +2=5」。即使人民知道「2+2=4」，也要對「2+2=5」堅信不移。人們的思想被意識形態扭曲得面目全非，主角Winston Smith的思想最終也徹底投降，被迫同意「2+2=5」。
 |
| https://www.foxnews.com/us/oregon-education-math-white-supremacy |
敗登明言舔共 Biden Explicitly Sucks CCP's Dick
This is Biden the Sinner.
敗登正仆街！
Biden: //You know, Chinese leaders... If you know anything about Chinese history, it has always been the time when China has been victimized by the outer world. It's when they haven't been unified at home. The central principle of Xi Jinping is that there must be a united, tightly-controlled China, and he uses his rationale for the things he does based on that. I pointed out to him, no American president can be sustained as a president if he doesn't reflect the values in the United States. And so the idea is, I'm not going to speak out against what he's doing in Hong Kong, what he's doing with the Uyghurs in the western mountains of China, and Taiwan trying to end the One China Policy by making it forceful. He said he gets it. Culturally, there are different norms that each country and their leaders are expected to follow.//
 |
| https://today.line.me/hk/v2/article/MG1zVD |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)