Vaccine Passport

I don't see how people aren't understanding the dangers with the vaccine passport idea.  It's normalising discrimination and hateful feelings towards those who won't go along with the majority.  It will not stop there.  It never stops there.

In 1933, Nazis introduced the Ahnenpass (ancestor passport).  It was a "health" passport which defined how Aryan you were and controlled everything you were allowed to do in life, and enabled millions of Jews and others to be discriminated against, enslaved and murdered.

Those who still choose to hop on the bandwagon are just fucking selfish.  Simple as that!

一二三，紅綠燈

駕車達十年的司機說，近年發現馬路上多了很多不必要的交通燈，原本是讓線或者廻旋處的地方，近年都改用交通燈代替。

從工程學數據來看，控制、分散車流，最有效的是迴轉處，其次是十字路口。交通燈只適用於汽車流量大而沒有行人過路處的地方，或者是需要定時讓行人過路的地方，因為交通燈會大大減低流速，數量太多只會造成交通癱瘓。

從道路使用者的角度來看，讓線和廻旋處，需要靠司機正確判斷路面情況，互相守禮，彼此守紀律。駕車的，總希望路面暢通，能以最短時間抵達目的地，所以彼此自有默契。以紅隧入口為例，六線入兩線，大家都會遵守一線一架的不明文習慣，互相禮讓。缺德的司機固然存在，但為數不多；整體運作，十年如一，行之有效。

近年不時看到區議員大張旗鼓，宣揚政績，「成功爭取」設置交通燈、保障街坊安全云云。交通意外有沒有因而減少，不得而知，但肯定增加了行車時間，由原本在讓線前看到沒有來車就可以駛出，變成現在必須等待轉綠燈才可前行。

同樣的規管亦見於行人。現在愈來愈少行人過路處是不設交通燈的。即使是人流稀少的新地區或屋苑附近，亦鮮見過路線。另外，不知從何時起，香港人對於過馬路守規則，有著一種宗教式的執著。從前即使燈號未轉，若眼見路上沒有汽車，大家自會邁步向前、走過馬路；但近年大家卻只會乖乖等待轉綠燈才肯過馬路，甚至會退化到沒有交通燈就（假裝）不懂過馬路。跟從交通燈指示，成為了「文明」的行為指標。

這種潛而默化的轉變，一去到防疫就表露無遺。香港人習慣了將權力和判斷交予政府，由政府安排你的行為，並以此作為文明標準。所以一旦出現所謂疫情，大家就臣服於政府專家的意見，贊同一切限制自由的措施。

香港的活力來自一種閒散的自由，而沒有規管的社會要運作良好，靠的是人民的判斷力，即是所謂的street smarts。十多年來，使用道路的自由逐漸被剝奪，地鐵、巴士日夜播放洗腦廣播，四周樹立多餘的圍欄和指示，結果香港人意志消毀，連street smarts和基本判斷力也丟失，智力亦隨之而下降。最後，一場假瘟疫，人人爭做奴隸，還要以此為榮。

其實獸印早就烙在香港人身上，時候到了，就化成一街口罩，滿目瘡痍。

面書服膺於深層國家 Facebook Working for Deep State

世衛將新型冠狀病毒列為國際公共衛生緊急事件，Facebook表示正努力限制有關該病毒的錯誤信息和有害內容的傳播，並將人們與有用的信息連繫起來。

深層國家操作︰傳媒利用propaganda製造消息，Facebook利用傳媒的消息作數據庫，製造數據模型，任何偏離數據模型的消息就會刪除；而傳媒背後是財團，財團就這樣操控無產階級的喉舌。


In response to WHO declaring the coronavirus a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC), Facebook is "working to limit the spread of misinformation and harmful content about the virus and connecting people to helpful information".

Deep State at work:
The mass media produces news based on propaganda.  Facebook then builds a model based on its database of news from the mass media.  Any news that deviates from the model would be eliminated.  Behind the mass media are the syndicates.  Through this operation, they can control the proletariats.

https://www.passiontimes.hk/article/01-31-2020/59552

逐步扭轉無罪推定觀念 Presumption of Innocence?

堂堂執法部門，長時期就網上言論發聲明澄清，日積月累，只會塑造出「無辜者有責任自辯」的文化，逐步扭轉社會固有「無罪推定」的觀念。更甚者，藉詞澄清，實質撒謊，只會令社會習慣「自辯者總在撒謊」。久而久之，普通法觀念與社會文化脫節，離推行大陸法的子不遠已。

C'mon, why bother clarifying when you are the law enforcing department?  When you keep clarifying for yourself for any accusations online, you are honestly trying to shape a culture in which the accused is expected to have the responsibility to prove himself innocent.  Worse still, your so called "clarifications" are, more often than not, blatant lies in broad daylight.  The public would only get used to not trusting anyone who defends for himself.

Given long enough time, the society would only go further and further away from the common law.  With a culture shaped, it would be a breeze to adopt the civil law.

https://www.facebook.com/HongKongPoliceForce/photos/a.964784386942859/2903654746389137/?type=3&theater