Tuesday, June 30, 2020

A Social-distancing Tram?

A driverless social-distancing tram?!  It looks sleek and refreshing, but please, don't make everything a contribution to social distancing.

https://www.designboom.com/design/island-driverless-social-distancing-tram-hong-kong-06-30-2020

front and rear feature full-rounded glasses and panoramic view

the exterior design is inspired by hong kong urban landscape

wide glass surfaces ensure natural light during the day, and awe-inspiring views at night

the interior features minimalist design, charcoal black walls, wooden floors and trims with natural finish

large circular benches facilitate social distancing as passengers sit facing outwards in a radial pattern

the tram stop facilitates a linear, orderly flow of people and a healthier environment

view of the interiors from the upper deck


退黨保平安

國安法當前,退黨自保,在個人層面上無可厚非。

然而,在群族命運上,在這個時候連自己的黨也可以放棄,這種人我們不能寄予厚望。

不是說退黨就是不對,而是民眾會(甚至應該)期望,一個負責任的政治領袖會預先有更好更明智的安排,而不是到逼不得已的一刻一走了之。


https://hk.on.cc/hk/bkn/cnt/news/20200630/bkn-20200630110414694-0630_00822_001.html


No Defense Exports to HK 美國停止軍用科技出口香港

It's official now.  No military-related equipment from the U.S. will be exported to Hong Kong.

Given the fact that Mr Elmer Yuan runs electronics business in the States and has companies in both Hong Kong and the States, it is not hard to put the pieces together and see why he suddenly publicly voiced out his anti-CCP stance in May and made sure his voice would get heard.

國務卿龐比奧正式宣佈,美國將停止軍用科技出口香港。

袁弓夷做美國電子零件生意,在香港及美國均有公司。現在不難猜測袁弓夷為何會在2020年5月忽然反共了。

高調展示立場,真懂得選時間。

https://www.state.gov/u-s-government-ending-controlled-defense-exports-to-hong-kong/

Monday, June 29, 2020

袁弓夷一小時專訪

一小時的訪問,的確有點失望。

對於一個有一定人生閱歷的人,說話內容和視野實在有點膚淺和狹隘,猶如一個中學生在考試寫出的觀點,好幾處連主持人也不禁失笑。

主持人問,你想美國做點甚麼?首項要求,竟然是要求美國收留香港年輕人,更指既然美國已驅逐大量中共國留學生,吸納香港年輕人成為美國公民絕非難事。拜託,這是甚麼觀點與視野?簡直難登大雅之堂,只是盡顯小家子氣。交待往年發生的事實時,連幾項法案(包括Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act)的名稱也說不出,要主持人幫忙補充,實在難看至極。

很明顯,主持人對國際形勢和香港角色,比受訪者掌握得更清楚。主持人不只一次想用問題引導受訪者作出更成熟更有智慧的討論和分析,可惜只換來那種只站在自身利益出發的一廂情願的觀點。

That said, it makes a very catchy headline by saying the US should "legislate that the CCP is a criminal organisation, and their 90 million members...should be sanctioned."

But please, tell me something I don't know.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_JU0rzwkcF4

Sunday, June 28, 2020

街工不參選

問對問題的人,首先被處死。

Whoever asks the right question first will be crucified first.

不理會初選的,自得其樂。

認真看待初選的,死得不明不白。

The carefree one gets a happy life.

The serious one died a painful death.


http://www.passiontimes.hk/article/06-28-2020/63974?

香港人只是在野共產黨 Hongkongers, the Communists in Disguise

2020年上半年學會的一件事︰香港人只是在野共產黨。

執政的不論是共產黨還是香港人,結果都只會是一場災難。

體制上有泛民,社會裡沒良知,只有偽善與裝模作樣。泛民執政後,就會出現集體暴政,比共產黨更共產黨。


Lesson learnt from the first half of 2020: Hongkongers are in fact communists in disguise.

It makes no difference who is in power, the CCP or the people of Hong Kong.  It is only going to be a disaster.

With the pan-dems in the institution and the lack of conscience among the hypocritical people, there will only be tyranny of the majority—which is more communist than the Chinese Communist Party.

Saturday, June 27, 2020

國民外交 vs 國際戰線

城邦派的國民外交,是一人一枝美國國旗,人人可以加入而又不會被代表。

泛民的國際戰線,是為了代表你。

可惜很多香港人都喜歡被代表,喜歡假手於人,自己懶得做。上班想推畀人,放假想休息,政治的事扮唔識,最好生活中每個細節都有機會示弱,好等別人代勞,自己不用付出。

Thursday, June 25, 2020

舒服抗爭?

這就是你們所說的「做實事」?

拋頭顱灑熱血,轟轟烈烈,冒著被補的危險,要不在巴士座椅上畫圖,要不在地鐵站貼「煲底見」,要不貼一張label紙,然後繼續捉人不戴口罩、捉大隻佬係鬼?

https://twitter.com/iamlamla/status/1275769382866579457


Monday, June 22, 2020

人血饅頭,歡欣shopping,開心打卡

商場不准商戶擺放政治意味的裝潢,那種自我審查固然可恨,但亦非全無道理。

更可恨的,是商戶竟厚顏地將自己的快樂建築在別人的痛苦身上,亦有小市民來到神像前開心打卡。

為甚麼會有人做得出這種行為?他們到底是甚麼心態?

圖騰是信仰,古已有之,要破除亦非易事,更非必要。不過,將代表圖騰的悲痛與童裝的天真放在一起,心裡真的一點痛楚也沒有嗎?

世界上有一種事情叫「搭配」。衣著講求顏色款式搭配,學外語要學懂詞彙用法搭配,煮食要拿捏材料味道搭配。一身質料上盛的運動衫褲、一對閃閃生輝的施華洛水晶耳環、一個沉實的LV手袋,三件可以是靚貨,但同時穿戴上身就是噁心。「罷工」的英文是「to go on a strike」或「to call a strike」,沒有人會說「to do a strike」或「to stop work」。豆豉蒸鯪魚可以是一道佳餚,但豆豉蒸新奇士橙只會令人反胃。

對比起財閥的自私自利與投鼠忌器,號稱並肩同行的人的差劣品味更令人介懷。

除了難受,只有難受。

It is of course depressing to see a shopping mall banning its merchant store from erecting political decorations, but their self-censorship doesn't come entirely unreasonable.

What's more agonising is to see how a business chain store can blatantly build its own profits on others' trauma and how people can gleefully treat the spot as a tourist site where they can take a good picture for God-knows-what reasons.

How can someone possibly do that?

Yes, totems have been a necessity in many civilisations since ancient times.  It is not easy, and not necessary, to absolutely do away with it.  But does it really not hurt at all when you put the grief of the totem and the children's pure happiness together?

If there is anything I know in life, it is called "matching".  You need to match the colours and the styles of different pieces of clothing you put on.  You need to learn the collocations of different words and their usuage when you learn a new language.  You need to match the tastes of the ingredients to make a good dish.  You can have well designed sportswear made with perfect materials; you can also have a pair of shining Swaroski earrings and a delicately manufactured LV bag.  But if you put on all these together, it becomes gross.  You say "to go on a strike" or "to call a strike", but you do not say "to do a strike" or "to stop work" because it makes you sound like an idiot.  You can steam a fish with shallots but you do not steam an orange with shallots even if you are a fan of both the orange and the shallot.

I don't mind businessmen being selfish and self-protective, but I do mind people who are allegedly fighting with me being self-complacent and ignorant.

There is nothing but agony here.

https://forum.hkgolden.com/thread/7252828/page/1

https://www.facebook.com/fans.hkgolden/photos/pcb.3161501283893396/3162213003822224/?type=3&theater

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=609357359967914


Monday, June 15, 2020

香港與美國 HK vs USA

Lee Davinci (a black guy in Maryland): //I've never been called a racial slur by a white person until I became a Trump supporter.  If you think white liberals really love your black ass, tell them you're voting for Trump and see how they respond.  These white liberals don't care about blacks, only the black vote.//

美國馬利蘭州黑人Lee Davinci︰//在我還未成為特朗普支持者之前,從來沒有白人說我種族歧視。你若認為白人左翼真心喜歡你這黑鬼,即管告訴他們你把選票投給特朗普,看他們有甚麼反應。白人左翼哪會關心黑人死活,他們關心的是黑人的選票。//

https://twitter.com/Lee_DaVinci/status/1271916888642240513?s=09

In Hong Kong:
the blacks = freedom fighters
the white liberals = the yellow-ribbon pan-dem supporters
Trump = 熱普城

香港的情況一致相若︰
黑人=抗爭義士
白人=泛民黃絲
特朗普=熱普城

Friday, June 12, 2020

回顧六一二 Looking Back on 6.12

Telegram

Telegram

"6.9" (9 June 2019) is going to go down in the history of Hong Kong, with its significant number of one million citizens taking to the streets, unfolding a series of events in its wake.  But "6.12" (12 June 2019) is a date a lot more significant when it comes to our growth in this battle for freedom.

Despite its symbolic number, the "6.9" procession was no different from any other demonstrations over the past two decades, in a sense that it was still led by a pan-dem authority with participants still placed under its shackle.  The focus of the public was still on the number of participants and how the event would look on the news.  Most participants still honoured peacefulness and showed little mercy on or support to the small number of protesters who were brave enough to break away from the conventional peaceful manner.  The failure of such a ritual was blatantly highlighted by the government's announcement right that evening that it would carry on with its second reading as scheduled on Wednesday 12 June.

"6.12" (12 June 2019) was the first time we broke away from the old shackles and replaced the conventional useless means with the BE WATER strategy.  We followed no leadership, we stayed at no fixed spot, we went physical with the armed officers—we owned the matter in our hands.  And we dispersed once we reached our goal (i.e. getting the LegCo paralysed and the extradition bill stalled).

"6.12" was also the date that unfolded the subsequent Battle of Constitution Protection, which managed to expose CCP's latent evil intent on HK under the international limelight and also managed to earn Hong Kong a spot on the China-U.S. trade deal table.

A year gone, we have yet won this battle, not even close.  But we have to hold on with gritted teeth.  Victory is far, but not that remote.

2019年6月9日,星期日,一百萬人上街,人數之多,將在香港史上留下印記。不過,在作戰層面而言,六一二則意義重大得多。

六九大遊行,意義上無異於過往二十年來的遊行︰始終由泛民大台領導,參與者始終沒有拋開「大台」枷鎖,大家關心的始終是晚上宣佈遊行人數的數字和畫面是否夠靚。遊行人士基本上仍堅守「和理非」信念,對於少數勇於衝擊防線的示威者嗤之以鼻,更視之為搞事份子。政府當晚隨即宣布審議程序將會如期繼續,在星期三直上大會二讀,正是六九遊行全然失敗的鐵證。

六一二,群眾拋低「大台」、「和理非」的枷鎖,與衙差奮勇抗戰,是我們的第一次。我們沒有「大台」,沒有紮守陣地,我們採取流水策略,一達到癱瘓議會運作、成功拖延逃犯條例修訂的目的就迅即離場。這是我們第一次決定要用自己的方式行動。

更重要的是,六一二抗爭為「香港憲法保衛戰」掀起序幕。「香港憲法保衛戰」把中共對香港出爾反爾的手段暴露於國際社會眼前,更令香港議題成為美國手上對抗中共的一張牌,從此再無人敢說香港在國際角力之間佔不了一席位。

一年過去,我們還未得勝,日後形勢更為險峻,我們更要咬緊牙關捱下去。勝利雖非近在眼前,但亦非遙不可及。

https://www.twreporter.org/a/photo-hong-kong-china-extradition-law-612-resistance

Tuesday, June 09, 2020

一路走來,始終如一 Being Consistent

一路走來,始終如一。

Being consistent is what makes a great political leader.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/103192686349131776

甚麼「生意佬信唔過」,完全是不知所謂。

Judgements on a political figure based on arguments like "businessmen are not to be trusted" are honestly an eye-roller.

鼓動市民上街,居心何在? The Ultimate Purpose of Mobilising the Public to Take to the Streets

街頭抗爭,在蘋果日報眼中是玩泥沙嗎?

以「紀念」去年6月9日100萬人遊行為名,鼓動市民上街,這理由站得住腳嗎?

還要動輒「末日」前「末日」後,末日是這樣的嗎?(況且,每隔三兩天就「末日」一次,夢遺嗎?一天未死未被消失也不會是末日,何況特朗普總統已經打出香港牌……)

城邦派提出的「超限戰」,是這個意思嗎?


標題要嘩眾取寵,是這個時候應有的堅持嗎?

道德底線還有更低嗎?

Is social movement some kind sand play in the eyes of Apple Daily?

Encouraging the public to take to the streets in the name of remembering the day when we had 1 million citizens taking to the streets in 2019—does this excuse even hold water?

Calling the state we are now in "the Armageddon" and using sensational terms as the headline—do we now look remotely like "the Armageddon"?  (A side note: do you ever see anyone whining about being agonised by "the Armageddon" every other day?  That's no different from a prostitute faking her climax every time she lies down.  We are not in any "Armageddon" as long as we are still breathing and not "forced to vanish" into thin air.  Besides, President Trump is already playing the Hong Kong card now...)

"Warfare Beyond the Limits" (超限戰) is a term coined by the Dr Wan Chin.  Does it even honour what it means?

Insisting on making flashy headlines at the cost of the citizens' lives, especially of the younger ones, is such insistence moral?

There is certainly no limits to immorality to Apple Daily.

https://hk.appledaily.com/

這個時候還鼓吹市民上街,只有以下原因︰

一、律師(如612人道支援基金)需要收入
二、防暴警需要發洩
三、中國需要人質作為中美談判籌碼
四、要用送頭來顯示香港仍有自由,增加權貴成功保住《香港關係法》的機會
五、 與美國劃清界線,打亂美國部署

Only these reasons can justify the decision of a major newspaper to encourage citizens to take to the streets at times like we are now in:

1. The barristers (e.g. those with 612 Humanitarian Relief Fund) need income;
2. The blood-thirsty riot police needs a vent;
3. The CCP needs hostages for its negotiations with the U.S.
4. The advocate needs to show the world HK is still a free state (by risking others' lives) so that there would be a higher chance to keep the US-HK Policy Act as it is for the privileged class.
5. The advocate needs to make a statement, showing its antagonistic stance against the U.S.

Friday, June 05, 2020

The Problem with Saying Nothing

When are our folks in Hong Kong going to have that kind of mentality and maturity to think, if not articulate, as demonstrated by tWitch?  Having the sense and calmness to overcome differences when it comes to fighting against something much stronger like institutionalised issues instead of zealously engaging in endless 批鬥 games?

Ellen DeGeneres: //I have said this on my social media, but I want to say it again to my viewers: I stand with the protesters who are exercising their rights, and I want to be an ally fighting for change.  As a white person, I don't always know what to say.  I think right now white people have to just sit in our discomfort.  We have to admit that there's a lot we don't know about black people's lives and about a black person's experience.  There is horrible injustice towards black people that has been ignored for far too long.  I've tried to use my platform to raise awareness on different issues over the years.  I'd like to think that I'm doing my best, but I think it's time that we have to look at ourselves and we have to say we have not done enough.  I want to learn how to be a better person, how to do better.  I was the dancing lady for a little while and now I want to help educate my audience.  I want to educate myself.  I want to say hi to my friend tWitch.  tWitch, I think a lot of people are being silent right now because everyone is scared they're going to say the wrong thing?//

tWitch: //Yes, there's a part of me that gets it because we have a society now that's like: on social media if you say the wrong thing you get ripped apart.  But here's the reason that's problematic.  It can go on many different things, right?  Like, as a man, there's going to be times that I'm going to have to speak up for misogyny and all kinds of stuff like that, but I can't be silent because I'm afraid of saying the wrong thing.  Out of love for the person that you're speaking up for, you have to be willing to make that mistake and then go back and correct it, so then you know.  That's because if you don't make the mistake, just by doing nothing, then that still is a stance.  A non-stance is a stance at this point in time, you know what I mean? So when it comes to race relations and how were yelling "Black Lives Matter" and speaking up for the injustices that we as black people have faced in this country for centuries now.  At this point, we just need allies.  We don't need you to be perfect because what we're fighting against is not perfect.  We don't need a well-formulated set.  We need people that care.  We need people that are willing to face the raw, uncut "I make mistakes, but I'll bounce right back to be with you all again".  We need that.  I understand a little bit of resistance and a little bit of hesitant forward motion for that.  But at the end of the day, you know, I love you.  You have many many many people of colour, black people, that love you.  I'm not talking about the social media folks, I'm talking about the people that could call you and from a place of love and say, "Yo, I saw what you were trying to say, but next time word it this way because of this."  And you know it's coming from a place of love, rather than like "We're going to tear a celebrity down!"  You know what I'm saying?  We don't have to worry about that right now.  What we have to do is we have to connect on the human level and make sure that we're showing each other that we care.  On the flip side of that, we also have to find a place of patience and not rip each other apart for trying. You know, sometimes things are going to be misspoken because we all don't have the same experiences.  So it's a lot of things that need to work at the same time, but none of us as a people on either side could stop trying.//